IndustriesView all →
DCData Centers & Mission-CriticalMechanical, electrical, plumbing, civil, structural, architectural, controls, ICT, and fire — coordinated for reliabilityINDIndustrial & Production FacilitiesProcess interfaces, utilities, multi-discipline designLOGLogistics & DistributionLarge-scale buildings, civil, MEP, fire systemsROBRobotics & Automated FacilitiesPower infrastructure, control systems, smart factory MEPEVElectric Vehicles & Advanced ManufacturingHigh-current power, process MEP, complex technical interfacesPHAPharmaceutical & Life SciencesCleanrooms, controlled environments, MEP compliance
ServicesView all →
ENG
Integrated Design and Engineering8 disciplines in-house · concept to construction documentation
BIM
BIM & Digital DeliveryModel federation · ISO 19650 · CDE management · clash detection
MEP
Reliable Building SystemsPower · cooling · controls · fire safety · utility interfaces
PCM
Project Coordination & ManagementInterface management · design reviews · issue tracking
AUT
Engineering Automation & Digital ToolsRevit automation · BIM checks · calculations · reporting
PRJSelected Projects
Not sure where to start?Talk to our team →

Information management for design and engineering

BIM and
digital delivery

We do not coordinate empty geometry. We coordinate engineering information so teams can decide, design, build, and hand over with a traceable technical record.

Discuss BIM delivery
Controlled information pathIllustrative ISO 19650 workflow
Project requirementInformation needed for a defined decision
  1. 01
    Work in progressDiscipline-owned information
    Develop
  2. 02
    SharedInformation available for coordination
    Review
  3. 03
    PublishedAuthorized for the agreed use
    Use
  4. 04
    ArchivedTraceable project record
    Record
Protected outcomeUsable, verified information

States, approvals, and information containers are configured to the project’s appointment, requirements, and common data environment.

Where BIM delivery fails

A model is useful only when its information can be trusted

Geometry can look coordinated while ownership, approval, maturity, and intended use remain unclear. The expensive problem is rarely the software. It is a break in the information process.

  1. 01

    Models exist, but responsibility is unclear

    Discipline models develop in parallel while interfaces, required inputs, and issue ownership remain unresolved.

  2. 02

    Checks happen, but issues do not close

    Clash reports grow without assignment, technical decisions, verification, or evidence that affected information was revised.

  3. 03

    Information is shared, but cannot be trusted

    A common data environment becomes file storage when status, suitability, revision, approval, and intended use are not controlled.

One information pipeline

Requirements become usable project information through control

BIM is the working method connecting responsibility, models, reviews, decisions, approvals, and delivery evidence. Each phase protects the next project decision.

  1. 01Define

    Set the information requirement

    Agree the project purpose, model responsibility, exchange points, naming, status, review rules, and acceptance criteria.

    Evidence

    BIM Execution Plan · responsibility matrix · information schedule

  2. 02Coordinate

    Bring disciplines into one review context

    Federate architecture, structures, civil works, building systems, controls, ICT, and fire protection around real interfaces.

    Evidence

    Federated model · issue register · coordination decisions

  3. 03Verify

    Test readiness before information is issued

    Check geometry, data, coordinates, classification, drawing consistency, exchange quality, and closure of priority issues.

    Evidence

    Model quality report · verified issue status · release record

  4. 04Deliver

    Issue information for a defined use

    Publish a coordinated package for decision, tender, construction, sequencing, quantities, or structured handover.

    Evidence

    Approved information containers · delivery record · asset data

Service scope

Six workstreams around one delivery purpose

The scope is configured around the project’s actual information gap. TEBIN can establish the method, operate the coordination process, or strengthen a defined part of an existing client workflow.

STRBIM strategy and project setupStructure before production

Translate client and project requirements into a practical BIM Execution Plan, model responsibility matrix, exchange schedule, common data environment workflow, and measurable acceptance criteria.

  • BIM Execution Plan
  • Model responsibility matrix
  • Information delivery schedule
FEDModel federation and issue managementCoordinate decisions, not empty geometry

Federate discipline models, define review rules, identify technical conflicts, assign ownership, record decisions, verify revisions, and close issues before the next delivery gate.

  • Federated model
  • Issue register
  • Coordination report
CDEISO 19650 information workflowMake information status unambiguous

Configure container naming, suitability and status logic, review and approval routes, access responsibilities, exchange milestones, and project-specific common data environment procedures.

  • CDE workflow
  • Naming and status rules
  • Review route
QACModel quality and exchange controlMeasure readiness before issue

Review coordinates, model structure, geometry, parameters, classification, drawing-to-model consistency, exchange files, and information completeness against the agreed delivery purpose.

  • Model quality report
  • Exchange validation
  • Readiness decision
VDCConstruction and existing-asset useConnect models to site decisions

Support sequencing, installation planning, quantity extraction, constructability review, point-cloud context, scan-to-BIM, refurbishment coordination, and contractor model exchanges.

  • 4D review
  • Model-based quantities
  • Existing-condition model
AIMDigital handover and asset informationClose information for operation

Define asset data requirements early, validate equipment identifiers and required parameters, reconcile final information, and prepare a structured record for the client’s operating workflow.

  • Asset information matrix
  • Validated handover model
  • Outstanding-item record

Readiness gates

The model is not proof. The controlled record is.

A gate should show what is ready, what remains open, which use is authorized, and who accepts the residual information risk.

  1. 01Basis

    Do teams know what information is required and who owns it?

    Purpose, roles, requirements, exchange plan, standards, and priority interfaces are agreed.

  2. 02Coordinated

    Can discipline information be reviewed as one technical system?

    Models are federated, interfaces reviewed, issues assigned, and decisions reflected in the source information.

  3. 03Ready to issue

    Does the package answer its intended project decision?

    Quality checks pass, priority issues close, residual risks are visible, and release authority is recorded.

  4. 04Delivered

    Can the recipient use and trace the information?

    Status, revision, suitability, source, approval, and handover requirements remain clear after exchange.

Project record

Coordination at industrial scale

For a mining facility programme, TEBIN reconstructed and coordinated fragmented design information across a measured site context. The model became a shared review environment for technical decisions, not a visual end product.

Read the project
Verified project evidenceMining Facility BIM Coordination Across 44 Buildings
44
Buildings reviewed
29 ha
Laser-scanned site area
3,000
Coordination issues identified
TEBIN scope

BIM reconstruction, multidisciplinary review, and construction coordination

Delivery context

Tools support the method. They do not define it.

Platforms are selected for the required exchange, coordination, review, and client environment. Responsibilities and acceptance criteria remain explicit regardless of software.

Working toolchain

Authoring and federation
Autodesk Revit · Civil 3D · AutoCAD · IFC workflows · Navisworks Manage
Review and issue control
Solibri · Revizto · BIM Track · Autodesk Construction Cloud · client common data environments
Automation and reporting
Dynamo · Python · Revit API · model-checking scripts · coordination dashboards
Existing conditions
Point-cloud processing · Autodesk ReCap · photogrammetry · scan-to-BIM workflows

Typical project environments

Project examples

Related project work

See how the same design and engineering capabilities appear in real project scope, interfaces, and deliverables.

All projects

Start with the information gap

Make the next delivery usable, not merely complete

Share the project stage, appointment structure, current models, information requirements, common data environment, and the decisions that are not closing. We will define the smallest useful BIM scope.

Discuss BIM delivery